Shameless Plug- Autistic Death Squad

Today’s post is a shameless plug of punk band ‘Autistic Death Squad‘, whose members, all AS/ASD, sing about preist scandals, women’s self-defense, the environment, and, of course, autistic self-advocacy. 

Some of their rough recordings (missing their bass, and in parts ad-libbed) can be found on youtube, such as No, Father Mackey, Doo Bop, and their signature anthem

They’ve released the lyrics, but no recording, for their response to the ongoing controversy over the Judge Rotenberg Center:

‘Shut Down the JRC’
Andre was just eighteen

hooked into a cruel machine

a device that was designed

to torture and to train his mind

on his waist the plastic box

sends a blinding blast of shocks

with a crash he hits the floor

strapped down gets thirty more

Nothing’s gonna stop it unless we do

we could stop the torture if we want to

Nobody’s gonna set it right

It’s time for us to fight

Let’s shut down the JRC tonight!

Andre sat upon the bed

staring straight and blank ahead

as his mother held his hand

and she tried to understand

for a decade while she wept

secrets told and secrets kept

dragged by law to light of day

see what they kept locked away



No way to stop the scream, 

the dystopian dreams

wretched rage and writhing on the floor 

see the trigger fingers itch, 

see the tortured bodies twitch

somebody flips the switch- how many more?

how many more, how many more must cry before



Link Roundup 2

Mindfreedom International is boycotting normal and occupying the APA in Philly this May.

MLK Jr‘s thoughts on being ‘maladjusted’

Liberal Ableism from Disabled Feminists- a great site that should be read by all. 

Spectrum Ensemble is putting on ‘Weird Beard, the Asperger’s Pirate’, with shows coming up on the 14th in Springfield, MO.

NDRN uncovers use of federal funds to exploit disabled workers in the US. 

Regarding Freak Separatism

Note: This is the opinion of a member of the Front; it has not been endorsed as any policy of the Front. 


One of the fundamental demands, often the most basic demand, of freak rights has been ‘inclusion’- inclusion by accommodation. We have demanded interpreters, braile, academic and sensory accomodations, wheelchair access, and so much more- and these are important things to demand. We should keep demanding them. However, no matter what we demand, the world we are asking to be included in, is still a world designed from a ‘typical perspective; the day when our needs are made central from the beginning, and not added on later, is still a long ways off- and some of our needs might never be central or fully accommodated by the neurotypical/physical-typical society.

Mindful of the knowledge, that to live in the world of the ‘typicals means to navigate the spaces and institutions of their world, it is time to discuss, in earnest, the idea of freak separatism. 

It must be clarified- we are not discussing a ‘freak homeland’ of any sort here. There is like to be no nation-state ruled by and for freaks. The logistics of such a project, the settling of people into the area, the rarely-peaceful struggles for political independence, the question of prior inhabitants are all too vast; we have learned from the last half-century of struggle over that strip of land between the Jordan and the Mediterranean that attempts to create a new homeland for any people can raise terrible issues. A nation-state is unlikely. Nor are we discussing the so-called ‘intentional communities’ that are in reality glorified asylums run by neurotypicals and the medical profession.

What we should discuss, and what is being discussed, is a form of ‘limited’ separatism. By this we mean, the creating and maintaining of spaces, communities, and institutions, defined and controlled by and for freaks- either certain freak communities or pan-freak spaces. Freak separatism means signed theater and poetry written for and by deaf people. It means social clubs and safe spaces run for and by freaks. It means wheelchair-positive architecture, peer-support mental health care, para-athletic teams, sensory-friendly study and social space, and freak-run intentional communities. Separatism exists within, or ‘near to’, the hegemonic and ableist society, but separates itself from the fundamental assumptions and norms underlying that society. Freak separatism means creating freak-centric spaces, both physically and socially, in which our needs and perspectives are not simply accommodated, but affirmed and made the normative standard. 

This is the freak separatism that we must build; inclusion is an important demand, but it cannot be our only one. We must demand inclusion, but also the right to our own spaces. 

Link Roundup

Sometimes, we like to shamelessly re-blog what other groups and sites have written, and post them in one big round-up of material. This is the first such roundup.

Neurodivergent Sexuality Tumblr rocks our world for challenging the desexualization of freaks with their frank celebration of hot, steamy freak sex. Blog posts on consent, fetish, freak GLBTs, etc abound. Good times. We’d like to affirm the right of freak adults to give their legal consent; we have the right to make decisions about our bodies. No means no, and yes means yes.

The Common Cause anarchist collective released this video about ableism- in a world where too many anarchist and radical groups mention ableism only in passing, or, worse yet, flagrantly engage in it as a matter of course, it is refreshing and empowering to hear Common Cause discuss it- and their insights are keen, on the role of disabled workers in class relations, on the need for self-critique by radicals, and so much more. Bravo.

This post from Incorrect Pleasures, recently re-blogged at Shift, asks: How far can autistic [or indeed, any freak] culture develop, without excluding NTs? On our facebook page, it started a full-fledged discussion about freak-centric communes and enclaves. As one FLFer said: “I inhabit a lot of spectrums and it is apparent to me that if NTs are around, the NeuroDifferent are invariably seen in relation and comparison to them…and that is a problem.”

The Loud Hands Project aims to promote autistic self-expression and self-advocacy, and that’s awesome.

We mentioned it once before, but: Occupy Psychiatry. Oh yes. Oh, yes indeed.

Faith Rhyne keeps ‘Cloud Calling’. It is a blog. A blog….. of madness! And, other stuff. It’s a good thing.

Communique to Autism Speaks: Hate Crimes and Culture of Dehumanization

Hello, assorted directors of Autism Speaks.

We assume you have you have heard the news, recently, about the investigation into the death of Jeremy Bostick, an eleven-year-old autistic boy, at the hands of his father. In case you have not, we shall fill you in. Jeffrey Bostick took his eleven year old son, put him in a sealed room, sat down, and opened a canister of carbon monoxide.

This was a tragedy, as I’m sure you would agree. Another tragedy, however, is the way this story has been covered. As we have seen happen again and again, the news stories have provided a sympathetic angle on Jeremy’s killer. Stories have focused on how much a burden Jeremy must have been, how much stress the family was under, how very understandable the murder was.

Autism Speaks, this is not an isolated incident- neither the murder, nor the rhetoric that surrounds it.

Charles-Anthoine Blais, 6, was drowned in the bathtub by his mother in 1996. The media made sure everyone knew just how devastating it was to have an autistic child, and how understandable this murder was. The murderer was showered in letters of support from parents of autistics. The court ruled that this murderer could be employed in advising parents of autistics, and she was offered a job at Société de l’autisme. The judge said that she did not represent a danger to society- autistics, it seems, are apparently not a part of your society.

Casey Albury, 17, was strangled to death in 1997. Her mother, if such a loving word can be used to describe her murderer, was sentenced to a measly five months. Before she was out, they were writing plays sympathizing with Casey’s killer, and newspaper articles titled ‘Loved to Death’.

Dale Bartolome, 27, was killed by his father in 2002. The news speculated, as usual: “What kind of pressures, however unintended, must the son have brought to bear on his parents?” One finds it hard to imagine that such pressure was equivalent to the pressure of the bullet Dale took through his head that July night.

This is a fraction of a fraction of the murders perpetrated on autistics. Remember Katie McCarron, Matthew Goodman, Mark Ownens-Young-Rogan, Pierre Pasquiou, Wayne Winter, Jim Helm, Stephanie Jobin, Daniel Luebner, James Joseph Cummings, Patrick Markcrow, Willie Wright, Jason Dawes, Terrence Cottrell, Tiffany Pickney, Nozuma Shinozaki, Angelica Auriemma, Casey Collier, Gabriel Britt, Eric Bland, Rylan Rochester, Jeffrey Bogrett, Maggie Caraballo, Brahim Dukes, Justin Malphus, Charles Mancill, Abubakar Nadama, Matthew Vick, and all the others. Remember their brutal murders, the slap-on-the-wrist sentencing for their killers, and the media response. We must remind you to remember them, because we found no mention of them on your site, despite the plentiful articles of any breakthrough towards prenatal testing or elimination of autistic traits. Why is Autism Speaks more interested in getting rid of us, than protecting us?

A pattern is clear. When an autistic murders a neurotypical, the media blames autism. When a neurotypical murders an autistic, the media blame…. autism. If a gay man is beaten to death, do we blame homosexuality? If a black man is murdered, do we blame blackness? When a parent commits sex-selective infanticide, do we blame femaleness? No. Such victim-blaming would be unacceptable; those who engage in it would be condemned in the eyes of all decent society, and rightly so. But, when an autistic is murdered, we blame autism. We blame the victim.

We charge that there exists a pervasive pattern of victim-blaming, shifting the responsibility for the killing of autistic people away from the bigotry, hatred, and murderous impulses of those who butcher us, and onto autistics ourselves- we who face these murders. Again and again, the cry, when an autistic is murdered- if only parents had more support! We won’t deny this point; more support is needed; in a society designed to meet the needs of one type of person, it is difficult to be responsible for a child whose needs, modes of thought, and ways of communication, are often radically different from those of other people. We advocate for more support and better, more respectful support. But, the lack of support does not excuse the murder of autistic people. It does not make murder any less murderous. It does not excuse the sick victim-blaming of the neurotypical press. This devaluing of autistic life and sympathy for our killers constitutes a culture of death aimed at our very existence.

Where does this culture, this apologism for the murder of autistics, this degradation of autistic lives and perspectives, this image of the autistic as the tragic burden whose murder is understandable, come from?

It may behoove us to take a look at the rhetoric used by those who dominate the national discussion on autism- chief among those groups being Autism Speaks.

Autism Speaks has been criticized and condemned repeatedly by autistic self-advocates for their portrayal of autistic people. The most visible and memorable of these was, of course, Autism Every Day, a film in which a mother declares, in front of her autistic daughter, that she wishes to kill that daughter and herself- but won’t, because of her neurotypical child. It’s bad enough that the life of an autistic is so worthless- but to say that it is worse to leave a neurotypical child deprived a parent, than it is to actually murder an autistic, is appalling and disgusting. Autism Speaks has never apologized for this video or removed it from circulation, and in fact prides itself in the film’s realistic portrayal of ‘heartbreak’. It surely warms every child’s heart to learn that his existence is a cause of heartbreak. What does that tell us, about what this organization thinks about the worth of autistic people?

Even when not explicitly making excuses for and sympathizing with the murderers of autistics, Autism Speaks’ rhetoric and message disenfranchises and disempowers autistic people. We hope that by now you are familiar with these complaints, but we will reiterate them in short. Time and time again, we are portrayed as burdens. We are infantilized and presented always as ‘children with autism’ as our default state. The focus is always on the parents and families of autistics, and how autism effects them, rarely if ever, beyond a few sanitized and neutered token cases, on the wishes, perspectives, or ideas of autistic people. Autistic self-advocates are ignored or marginalized- a trend dramatically illustrated by the total lack of any people on the spectrum in the board of directors. The organization focuses proportionally little of its energy on accomodation and empowerment, and great resources on prenatal testing and the elimination of autistic behaviors which inconvenience neurotypical people. The message of Autism Speaks is clear. We are a burden. We are not wanted. In the all too many narratives, it is better that we die or are never born, than that we burden you any longer. Such thought and messages are exactly what lead to media apologetics for murder, and enable and empower those who would kill autistic people.

Autism Speaks, we will not beg. We demand, as autistic self-advocates, that you cease this rhetoric against autistic people. We demand that you enfranchise autistics within your organization, that you listen to and value autistic self-advocates (including, especially, the majority who are critical of you), that you cease this focus on ‘families with autism’ and ‘autistic children’, and that you cease your pervasive, profoundly (and ironically) un-empathetic and dehumanizing portrayal of autistic people as burdens. We demand an apology for ‘Autism Every Day’, and a general apology for your disenfranchisement of autistic voices. We demand that when this sort of hateful speech and murder-apologetics pops up, that your organization move to condemn it, as it should be condemned.

We are the autistic. We will not stand another murdered friend. We will not stand being blamed for brutality perpetrated upon us. We demand human respect and dignity. We will not apologize for being ‘burdens’ in your lives; your hate, your contempt, and your murders are a greater burden that we must bear. We are sick- sick of being murdered, sick of dehumanizing rhetoric, and sick of excuses.

Autism Speaks, until you change, the blood of the murder of our autistic brothers and sisters flows from your tongues to stain red your hands. Remember Jeremy, and all the others, and change your ways.

Freak Liberation Front

Reclaim the R Word!

I pledge, as a person who has been called the R word, as a person who is still called the R word, as a person who lives daily with the stigma of being a neurologically atypical person, to call this initiative out as the humbug it is.

I do not support the R-word. It is an ugly word. It is a hurtful word. It is an insulting, demeaning, terrible word. But you know what? It’s not the word itself that makes it so insulting. It’s the society that spawned that word- a society that will spawn another, and another. You know why? Because cosmetic changes to the language without changes to the actual structures of the society change nothing. The problems that ‘people with disabilities’ face don’t come from a nasty word. They come from structural, institutional injustice. They come from a society that is built for, designed for, dominated by, and run by one basic type of person; the ‘able-bodied’ ‘mentally typical’ person- a society that considers one way of perceiving, sensing, processing information, communicating, and moving to be valid at the exclusion of all others. They come, not from the use of nasty words, but from the ways in which this supremacist, normative mindset is built into every institution of our society.

What I see here, what I see every time I see one of these shirts or stickers, is not a movement that promises to change those structures. I see a feel-good effort to make a cosmetic and superficial change to how atypical people are treated by society without actually changing the real conditions of their disenfranchisement. I see a movement that pretends that the real problems facing the whole range of people who get CALLED the R word have nothing to do with disproportionate unemployment, or exposure to quack therapies and abusive treatment, or homelessness, or the rate at which mentally atypical people are victimized by crime, or a broken health care system, or the stigma and disrespect that can be and is very clearly expressed without using the R word, or the patronizing attitudes that this sort of ‘kind normal people riding in to help the mentally disabled’ thing breeds, or the attitude of normativity and supremacy implicit in the entire way people think about mental differences. No, it’s about the R word. If only we can end that word! That awful word! Truly, THAT is the most important “disability rights” issue of the day! Ending the R Word will bring real change to the mentally different, just like ending the N word brought real change to African Americans, ending the F word brought real change for GLBTQ people, ending the B word would bring change to women, and if we just stopped calling the homeless (a disproportionate amount of whom are mentally atypical) ‘bums’, surely their troubles would fly away! Oh, if only we could end the word, and then all the normies could go on home and rest contented that they really made a difference, while the people they’ve successfully rebranded face once more the same, continued challenges they’ve faced before, untouched by this surface change.

So, I don’t pledge to end the word. I pledge to embrace the word. I pledge to embrace every slur and pejorative used against mentally different people. I pledge to own them.  I pledge to support the SELF-advocacy of atypical people, whatever their condition. I pledge to fight for the things that really matter to us, because I’d rather be employed, housed, receiving the accommodations I need to thrive in a society designed for someone else’s mental and physical layout, and called a disrespectful slur, than be unemployed, homeless, structurally disadvantaged, and called a polite euphemism. I pledge not to use a euphemism to whitewash and ignore the continuing injustices we face. I pledge to keep using that word to acknowledge and highlight the ugliness of social injustice, until that injustice is no more, and if I can, I pledge to turn that word into a symbol of pride and self-worth. I am a freak. I am a retard. I am a psycho. I am a spaz. Hear me roar.”

A Freak Responds to ‘Occupy Psychopaths’

The Occupy Psychopaths video disgusts me. If you haven’t seen it, it’s a couple of minutes of some (most likely neurotypical) amateur psychiatrist explaining how the real problem with the world is…. psychopaths! They’re apparently getting into power and manipulating people and how We have to be vigilant against Them or They will win and We must know how They operate to root Them out. The whole video basically devolved into a conspiracy theory and a call for a witch-hunt, the sort of rhetoric you’d expect from a white supremacist talking about zionist bankers.

People need to stop using neurodivergent mental conditions as a cheap pejorative to attack their political opponents. I know, it feels satisfying for a normie to call the social elite psychopaths, for roughly the same reason it feels satisfying to say that neoclassical economists have an ‘autistic’ mindset and need ‘post-autistic’ economics. You can get out what you want to say about your political opponents in an insulting way that expresses your dislike of them and, more importantly, delegitimizes their viewpoint, not by showing it to be wrong, but by putting them in the loony bin. This sort of tactic comes in two forms. The first is using a neurodivergent status as an insult; saying that the system is crazy or that we have autistic economics or that the policy is retarded. This is not acceptable- it’s using people as an insult. When you use that rhetoric, you make the neurodivergent people, from manic-depressive to autistic to Downs syndrome, feel unwelcome and hostile in the movement. It’s a clear signal to us- freaks are bad, and are not wanted; we use your conditions as an insult.
The second form is scapegoating- taking a complex, structural social injustice, and literally blaming it on neurodivergent people. That’s what Occupy Psychopathy does. It’s basically a bunch of NTs seeing other NTs acting in a horrible way, and assuming that they must be non-NT- because no normy could ever act in a callous, unempathetic, exploitative way!

It’s not only inaccurate and offensive, it’s counterproductive. Corporations act in the way they do because it is most profitable- and they do what is most profitable without concern for people because the law requires them to, because a caste of economic technocrats glorify cutthroat profit making and tell us that this sort of activity really ends up making everyone better off, because they don’t know the people they’re hurting, and because they’re paid very well to maximize profit. These are complex social causes, rooted in the development of whole societies, not infiltration of society by ‘psychopaths’, ‘sociopaths’, or people with ASPD. Until we recognize that this is a systemic problem, and that complex causes, not least of which is the nature of power itself, lead to this sort of behavior, we won’t find solutions. We’ll keep having powerful people doing horrible things, people calling them psychopathic, and nobody bothering to understand, why people in power keep doing these things or how the system of social privilege and power really works. The oppression continues, and the grease in its gears, keeping it running and deflecting real social criticism, is mentalism. The problem isn’t mad people getting power- the problem is the abusive, wrongful, dehumanizing nature of power.

Instead of Occupying Psychopaths, we suggest Occupying Psychiatry: